Skip to content

Want museum? Hold referendum

The Editor, Re: "Destination museum dream re-floated," News, March 27. Taxpayers should be outraged that projects of this magnitude are thrust upon us rather than holding a referendum to see if there really is an appetite for such a facility.

The Editor,

Re: "Destination museum dream re-floated," News, March 27. Taxpayers should be outraged that projects of this magnitude are thrust upon us rather than holding a referendum to see if there really is an appetite for such a facility.

Governments have a history of running over budget, so it is likely the $59 million is just the starting point and to think that the complex will break even financially in five years is just "pie in the sky." Museums are not noted for making money.

Quotes attributed to Connie Baxter, Richmond's Museum and Heritage Services supervisor, on the need for such a facility are rather weak. Sounds more like empire building. "A source of community pride," - $59 million worth? "Population increase has created a tremendous demand for new services" - a $59 million museum? "Necessary component of a balanced and healthy community" - please, I'm sure Richmond will do just fine without it. "Tell the Richmond story," - beware!

City council should be reminded that a group of private investors opened a museum in Vancouver's Gastown several years ago to tell the "Vancouver story." Storium enjoyed a very brief life as the investors were forced to close shop to cut their losses. Unfortunately, Richmond taxpayers will not be spared the pain as we will also be responsible for the annual operating costs (at least $500,000/year).

L.B. Black Richmond