The Editor,
Re: “Branscombe shows imprudence,” Letters, Oct. 10.
I would like to endorse the views of letter writer Eric Sykes about why city council endorsed such heavy spending on Branscombe House when there seems to be no case for this. With upcoming elections, voters should be given costing information on why this building was refurbished, when it is apparent that nobody wants to lease it. The obvious choice would have been to move the building to the heritage site at Britannia shipyards. The Sale of the land would have covered much of this cost.
With upcoming elections, it would be good to know the cost of the linear Railway Rd project, which is an excellent example of council spending and is already well used.
The proposal to raise the tenure of councillors to four years is also a problem. If this is done, then it should be combined with term limits for councillors, to ensure that some fresh ideas are bought on board.
One example is the length of tenure of Coun. Harold Steves, who tells us that the Onni project in Steveston Village is a an eyesore. Much of the reason for this, however, is because he is insisting that they have a maritime theme and objecting to any modification of this when it is abundantly apparent that there is no way for this to occur.
The boardwalk could be a vibrant and attractive area if council would allow modifications. However, backed by the Steveston Merchants Association who fear competition, there are still barriers placed in the way of it opening. Maritime shops are closing in Steveston at this time.
Voters should think on these matters when they go to the polls in November.
Don Burgess
Richmond
