Dear Editor,
Re: “Onni hotel plan causes concern,” News, April 5.
That Onni has finally agreed to pay a $5.5 million community contribution amenity in exchange for rezoning the Steveston Boardwalk is (at first glance) encouraging.
However, once again Onni is prioritizing its undaunted goal of maximizing profit over the safety, security and sundry objections of nearby residents and merchants.
Despite having heard multiple concerns (December meeting) regarding its proposed operation model for a hotel, Onni has not only reiterated but expanded its plan for a “remote operational model” — one that necessarily deems null the need for a 24-hour desk and/or security provisions.
Although Chris Evans (executive VP, Onni Group) was present to hear the speakers’ concerns, Onni has made no effort to address their worries.
It also appears that Mr. Evans’ clarification “…that the proposed hotel would only utilize Airbnb’s room booking model” is only partially true, as the model has been expanded to include room access without the assistance of on-site hotel personnel.
Nowhere in Onni’s recent proposal is reference to a conventional hotel model, as was discussed.
That Onni continues to make unprecedented demands without regard for Richmond residents is disappointing but not unexpected. Throughout the on-going Steveston boardwalk saga, Onni has clearly revealed itself as anything but a good corporate neighbour.
I encourage city council to not be further browbeaten by Onni, to not approve Onni’s ostensible “hotel” operation model.
Debbie Pawluk
RICHMOND
