Skip to content

Letter: Bridge over troubled pilings

Dear Editor, While I totally support the need for a new crossing of the south arm of the Fraser River, I have some reservations about the proposed new bridge to be built atop the George Massey Tunnel.
Bridge
Richmond Chamber chair Rob Akimow says his group supports the province’s Massey Tunnel Replacement Project. Photo submitted

Dear Editor,

While I totally support the need for a new crossing of the south arm of the Fraser River, I have some reservations about the proposed new bridge to be built atop the George Massey Tunnel.

As a part of the planning process, boreholes were drilled to depths more than 1,000 feet on both sides of the river.

It turns out that the boreholes, as reported about three years ago, revealed nothing but sand and silt.

At some depths, it was so mushy that cores could not be retrieved.

The plan, as I understand, is to build two concrete towers, 500 feet or more high, astride the George Massey Tunnel to support a bridge deck, 10 lanes wide on nothing more than waterlogged sand and silt.

One can’t help but think about the possibility of two leaning and sinking towers.

I suspect another tunnel with four (possibly six) new lanes while retaining the proposed Highway 99 roadway/transit improvements could be designed and built in less time and at less cost versus the proposed bridge.

Frank Suto

Richmond