Skip to content

Editorial: Selling it to us isn't leading us

Politicians such as Christy Clark and Peter Fassbender struggling to convince the public without digging into our own pockets
Christy Clark
Christy Clark

When the teachers’ strike divided the province last summer, everyone in B.C. supported the government — financially, if not philosophically.

That’s because the Liberal government shelled out $350,000 for Google ads and sponsored Facebook posts while classrooms were empty. Except for a few social media users who’ve lost defamation suits, it’s tough to think of anyone who’s spent that kind of dough on social media.

And who got the taxpayers’ money? The same marketing firm that designed the Liberal logo and helped push Christy Clark to victory in her bid for the party’s leadership. All apparently without a contract having gone to tender.

The NDP jumped on the scandal, admonishing Clark for not investing that cash in education. They’re right.

The Liberals reached into our pockets to win our minds, even as they were claiming there was no more money for teachers’ demands.

Education Minister Peter Fassbender defended the ad campaign on the grounds the Liberals had a responsibility to present Clark’s side of things — a side apparently inadequately represented on every TV news show, radio program, and newspaper article covering the strike.

As evidence for the success of the social media onslaught, Fassbender pointed to the huge number of parents who signed up for the $40-a-day strike stipend. Apparently we were bought with our own money not once, but twice on that score.

Clark was elected to lead, not to sell. That’s something politicians increasingly can’t seem to distinguish.