Skip to content

Column: Richmond is stronger after modular housing debate

"Communication leads to community, that is, to understanding, intimacy and mutual valuing." — Rollo May
TMH
Wendy Meloche (left), a supporter of the housing, and Kate Liu, who opposed the project, were pictured outside of Council Chambers before last Thursday's council meeting. Daisy Xiong photo

Two nights and two five-hour, back-to-back council meetings on modular housing for the homeless. It was long and exhausting, but by the end of the saga, I found myself feeling inspired — and a little bit emotional.

As a reporter, I’m expected to get the facts, and the fact was the proposal passed. But, strangely, I was less interested in the result than in how one community as “us” (not “you” and “I”) had a discussion.

When was the last time you sat down and listened to someone who had completely different views?

Most of us tend to speak with, and listen to, like-minded people. Yet, last week, hundreds of people in Richmond heard different, and often times, opposing voices at meetings at Richmond city hall.

Many shared their views on what they believe Canadian values are and what it means to be a Richmond resident — an important part of which is to not leave people behind.

Some told how they, or someone they knew, came back from the brink, thanks to the support of others.

Meanwhile, opponents of the project explained why they have concerns and pleaded for understanding.

People listened to each other — with respect.

I have been reporting on the modular housing proposal since the very first open house back in February. The whole thing had a rough start with, what turned out to be, an irrelevant kicking incident.

Following that open house, hundreds, if not thousands, of residents in the Brighouse neighbourhood started protesting the project on social media, through letters, rallies, forums and flyers.

A counter-group in favour of the project was then formed to fight for its approval.

People were fearful: Was Richmond becoming divided? Was it already?

But that’s not the whole story.

The group opposing the project held a forum to explain their concerns. Activist De Whalen and other project supporters attended to listen and try to understand. Later, Whalen told me she walked away “feeling inspired” by the opposition’s desire to have conversations.

A third group was then formed and stepped up to host a meeting for both sides along with local authorities. Although it was interrupted by some angry audience members towards the end, the meeting was still considered helpful.

Organizers from the two sides also tried to arrange coffee to look for common ground. In fact, by the time we came to the final meetings at city hall, I saw some of them greeting each other with waves and friendly smiles while holding opposing signs.

From there, I’ve seen hope for our community.

We can be very different, but as long as we keep talking and getting to know each other, the bridge is being built and eventually, we will get there.

Council came up with a result, some will like it others won’t but what we can all and people came to a better understanding of each other, which I believe makes Richmond stronger.