These corporate claims were filed with the B.C. Supreme Court registry in Vancouver.
Information is derived from notices of civil claim. Civil claims have not been tested or proven in court.
Defendants
1186634 B.C. Ltd. and West Point Pacific Holdings Inc. and Sarabjit Singh Gill and Amandeep Kaur Gill and Kalwinder Singh Dosanjh and Tarlochan Singh Sahota and Vikash Sami and Cuiling Sami and 1211121 B.C. Ltd. and 1132360 B.C. Ltd. and Ariigo Investment Ltd. and 1311067 B.C. Ltd. and Dalbir Singh Dosanjh and Jagir Kaur Dosanjh and AU Milan Holdings Inc.
Plaintiff
West Point (Queens Park) LP
Claim
Damages for breach of trust, breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract and an order that the plaintiff holds constructive trust over eight Lower Mainland properties after the defendants, as directors of the plaintiff partnership, took out unauthorized mortgages on a property owned by the plaintiff and used the funds to purchase or build on other properties for their own gains.
•
Defendants
2846869 Ontario Inc. and Martin Lantaigne
Plaintiff
TerraZero Technologies
Claim
A declaration that a laptop, licences for items in a digital account, three blockchain accounts with NFTs or cryptocurrency tokens and a laptop are owned by the plaintiff and damages for wrongful detention of property.
•
Defendants
John Hancock and PI Financial Corp.
Plaintiffs
Steven Harvey and Linnell Harvey and Paytyn Le Vesconte and 1276929 B.C. Ltd.
Claim
Damages for negligence, and breach of fiduciary duty and of contract after the plaintiffs lost over $1 million due to mismanagement by the defendants of their investment accounts.
•
Defendants
John Hancock and PI Financial Corp.
Plaintiffs
Brian Radke and Snow Pine Ventures Inc.
Claim
Damages for negligence, and breach of fiduciary duty and of contract after the plaintiffs lost around $1.5 million due to mismanagement by the defendants of their investment accounts.
•
Defendant
St. Alcuin College for the Liberal Arts Society doing business as Alcuin College
Plaintiff
Montaigne Group Ltd.
Claim
Damages for breach of agreement, and an order requiring the defendant to obtain a strata plan for the college lands and transfer the ownership of an attached amenity space to the plaintiff as agreed upon after the defendant unilaterally cancelled the agreement based on an alleged breach by the plaintiff.
