Skip to content

Letter: School board urges Ministry to reconsider cuts

Eric Yung is the chair of the Richmond School Board
trustees
Richmond School Board trustees and district staff, pictured last month with Richmond MLAs Linda Reid, fourth from left, and John Yap, fourth from right, are mulling proposals for how to find government-enforced $1 million in cuts to administration costs.

April 7, 2015

 

Dear Ministers De Jong and Fassbender,

 

On behalf of the Board of Education (Richmond) and the staff, students and parents we serve, I would like to express our tremendous disappointment at the requirement that the 60 school districts in the province generate $29 million in administrative cuts in the 2015/16 fiscal year, and then an additional $25 million in the following year.

The characterization of these arbitrary and enforced reductions as “low hanging fruit” is particularly galling, and disrespectful of the role that elected school boards have played in running our school districts in a constantly constrained budget environment while continuing to provide the highest quality of education to students in BC.

Over each of the next two years, Richmond will be expected to reduce our administrative costs by about $1 million, on top of unfunded inflationary pressures which will impact our budget by close to $0.5 million over the same period, and $2.5 million in reduced operating grants due to declining enrollment. $8 million over a two year period will mean significant job losses, because after so many years of reduced operating budgets and unfunded cost increases, there are no more easy cuts.

Richmond has for many years been an active participant in shared services initiatives amongst school districts, and has had a long standing agreement with the City of Richmond that has generated significant cost reductions for both the City and the School District. The recent provincial focus on shared services for the education sector is not expected to generate any significant savings in Richmond, and may in some cases even lead to additional costs.

Our 2014/15 Amended Annual Budget, which was approved by the Board as recently as February, sets district administration costs at 2.9% of the overall operating budget. Such slim administrative costs should be held out as the model for efficient operations, instead of being used as a means to punish school districts.

We therefore urge you to reconsider the enforced administrative cuts, and instead focus on the recommendations of the Select Standing Committee on Finance and Government Services to provide stable, predictable, and adequate funding to school districts.

  

Sincerely,

 

Dr. Eric Yung, Chairperson

On Behalf of the Board of Education (Richmond)